Course Description
Principles and practice of lighting design for theatre, television and film. Prerequisite: THR 146/THR 146L AND THR 240; or permission of instructor.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
List the fundamental tools of lighting design
Understand and explain the lighting design process
Apply the fundamental tools and design process to various individual performance scenarios
Analyze the needs of a performance piece and identify the steps necessary to satisfy those needs
Critically evaluate personal work and the work of others
Communicate and collaboratively integrate feedback
Craft a lighting design for a small performance
Course Grading Information:
Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
See all SOT productions in Fall 2026 and writing papers | 30% |
Lighting Design Projects | 40% |
Lighting Lab | 30% |
A, A-: Excellent work; complete, detailed, consistently dynamic
B+, B, B-: Very good work; fairly complete but not consistently dynamic
C+, C, C-: Average to good work; meets minimum requirements but lacks details
D+, D, D-: Below average; sloppy, incomplete work
F: Failing; does not meet the goals of the assignment
Grading Scale:
A 100% to 91.5%
A- < 91.4% to 89.5%
B+ < 89.4% to 87.5%
B < 87.4% to 81.5%
B- < 81.4% to 79.5%
C+ < 79.4% to 77.5%
C < 77.4% to 71.5%
C- < 71.4% to 69.5%
D+ < 69.4% to 67.5%
D < 67.4% to 61.5%
D- < 61.4% to 59.5%
F <59.4 to 0%
Attendance/Participation:
Class participation will be graded according to the following rubric:
The extent to which:
1. The student regularly attends on time.
2. The student regularly contributes or actively listens during class discussions.
3. The student Participates in hands-on activities.
4. The student demonstrates a positive attitude and respectfully conducts themself during class sessions.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
No book required.
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.