Sociological Perspectives on Gender

Course Description

Inquiry into status of genders in society with emphasis on structural and institutional relationships as well as socialization and the continuities and discontinuities in gendered displays across the life cycle. Note: Same as WGS 329.

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will be able to:

  • Understand the typical ways in which gender shapes identity and lived experience
  • Reflect upon key institutions that are organized by gender
  • Understand how and why gender intersects with race, class, age and sexual orientation
  • Understand and evaluate how gender takes on different meanings across cultures and time periods and how such meaning shaped gendered social life
  • Be able to identify, describe, apply, and understand the major theoretical perspectives in gender studies
  • Be able to apply a social construction framework as a tool to critically evaluate gender
  • Explain how gender is produced within social institutions and how these institutions affect individual lives.
  • Analyze the mutual constitution of gender, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, nationality, and religion.

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure Percentage/Points
12 Quizzes, one each week, 25 points each 300 points
5 Discussion Groups, roughly every two weeks, 40 points each 200 points
6 Films and written analyses, 50 points each 300 points
1 Final Research Project 200 points

Grading Scale

Percentage Letter Grade
1000-920 pointsA
919-890 pointsA-
889-870 pointsB+
869-820 pointsB
819-790 pointsB-
789-770 pointsC+
769-720 pointsC
719-690 pointsC-
689-670 pointsD+
669-620 pointsD
619-590 pointsD-
Below 589 pointsF

Attendance/Participation:

Attendance is not required for this asynchronous/online course

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

Course materials will be provided by the instructor

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.