Social and Personality Development

Course Description

Examination of current theories and empirical research concerned with social, emotional, and personality development. Prerequisite: Grade of at least C- in PSY 250 or HDF 111; concurrent enrollment in PSY 311 OR previous credit for PSY 311.

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will be able to:

  • Build on what you learned in an introductory course on development, with a focus on social processes and contexts.
  • Learn to critically analyze and discuss social developmental research using the principles of scientific thinking.
  • Demonstrate content knowledge of the major theories and key aspects of social development in childhood.
  • An ability to review the literature on a particular topic.
  • Experience generating research ideas to solve problems or consider new perspectives.

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure Percentage/Points
Quizzes 30%
Attendance/Participation 10%
Paper #1 30%
Paper #2 30%

Grading Scale:

Percentage Letter Grade
93% or higherA
90-92%A-
87-89%B+
83-86%B
80-82%B-
77-79%C+
73-76%C
70-72%C-
67-69%D+
63-66%D
60-62%D-
Under 60%F

Attendance/Participation:

To encourage engagement with course material, periodic in-class attendance and participation checks will be administered. These activities may include brief quizzes, polls, reflections, or content questions and can only be completed during class. Because attendance checks occur at various points throughout the semester, students are expected to attend class regularly and arrive on time. To allow for occasional absences, the lowest three attendance scores will be dropped. Make-up attendance checks will not be offered.

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

Social Development (3rd Edition) by Ross Parke, Glenn Roisman, and Amanda Rose ISBN: 978-1-119-49746-2

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.