Body Image Development in Childhood: Parent, Peer & Media Influence

Course Description

Survey of scientific theories and research findings on body image in early to late childhood with a focus on the roles of child cognition, parents, peers, and the media on body image development. Prerequisite: Grade of at least a C- in PSY 121.

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will be able to:

  • describe foundational theories and findings of body image research and identify the major contributors to negative and positive body image in adulthood;
  • describe the major milestones of body image development in early to late childhood;
  • identify the nature of the influence of various aspects of child cognition and behavior, parenting behavior, peer interactions, and children’s media participation on body image development in early to late childhood;
  • critically evaluate key theories and research on body image development;
  • apply key theories and research to practical problems in body image development (e.g., developmentally appropriate messaging for children).

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure Percentage/Points
Quizzes 30%
Essay tests 30%
Special topics write-ups 20%
Independent Project 20%

Grading Scale:

Percentage Letter Grade
93-100A
90-92A-
87-89B+
83-85B
80-82B-
77-79C+
73-76C
70-72C-
67-69D+
63-66D
60-62D-
< 60F

Attendance/Participation:

Attendance is optional. Students who miss class will be unable to participate/turn in assignments relevant to course material (i.e., test dates and special topics dates/write-ups require class attendance).

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

Grogan, S. (2022). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children (4th Ed). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Body-Image-Understanding-Body-Dissatisfaction-in-Men-Women-and-Children/Grogan/p/book/9781003100041

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.