Course Description
Case-method approach to issues involving civil liberties and civil rights. Examination of historical evolution of Supreme Court decisions and evaluation of the Court's reassessment of previous decisions.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
To practice the skill of reading and analyzing written judicial opinions.
To become familiar with the Bill of Rights and its interpretation by the U.S. Supreme Court.
To explore the Court’s treatment of individual liberties, including freedom of religion, free speech, freedom of the press, right to bear arms, and privacy.
To explore the states’ obligation to provide protections against discrimination.
Course Grading Information:
Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
Case brief book | 100 points |
Class participation (2 in-class practice exams) | 30 points |
Oral brief | 20 points |
Unit One exam | 100 points |
Unit Two exam | 100 points |
Unit Three exam | 100 points |
Attendance/Participation:
Attendance will be taken, and points will be deducted from the final point total based on the following number of absences:
Excessive absences, tardiness or leaving early: -15 points
Rarely comes to class except on exam/assignment days: -30 points
(* “Excessive” = more than 6 absences; “Rarely” = more than 10 absences)
*Tardies and leaving early count as ½ an absence unless you notify me
Grading Scale
(Total = 450 possible points)
A = 417–450 pts
A− = 403–416 pts
B+ = 394–402 pts
B = 372–393 pts
B− = 358–371 pts
C+ = 349–357 pts
C = 327–348 pts
C− = 313–326 pts
D+ = 304–312 pts
D = 282–303 pts
D− = 268–281 pts
F = 267 pts and below
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
Epstein, Lee and Thomas G. Walker. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties and Justice. 2025. 12th edition. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. (Available at the University Bookstore; also available as an e-book).
Three blue books for written exams (available at the campus bookstore).
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.