Judicial Process

Course Description

Analysis of the American legal system, focusing on the behavior of actors in that system, theoretical foundations of the system, and policy-making role of the courts.

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will:

  • gain an introductory understanding of the structure of the American court system

  • explore their expectations of the court system and appreciate the way courts influence society

  • learn how judges make decisions, and why this process is different from our long-held myths about judges

  • practice reading and analyzing written judicial opinions and examine recent decisions

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure

Percentage/Points

Quizzes (5)

25 points each (125 points total)

Discussions (5)

15 points each (75 points total)

Midterm exam

100 points

Final exam

100 points

*There are 6 quizzes. Your lowest quiz grade will be dropped.

*There are 6 discussions. Your lowest discussion grade will be dropped.

Grading Scale

Percentage

Letter Grade

370-400

A

358-369

A-

350-357

B+

330-349

B

318-329

B-

310-317

C+

290-309

C

278-289

C-

270-277

D+

250-269

D

238-249

D-

0-237

F

Attendance/Participation:

Attendance/participation is not a graded component included in the student's final grade for this course.

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

Carp, Robert A., Kenneth L. Manning, Lisa Holmes, and Jennifer Bowie. 2025. Judicial Process in America. 13th edition. CQ Press. (E-book available).

To successfully complete the course, you will need a stable internet connection, a computer or tablet with audio and video capabilities, the most recent version of Chrome (Canvas seems to work best in this browser), and your UNCG email account.  All technology questions and issues should be addressed to UNCG 6-TECH. 

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.