Introduction to Comparative Politics

Course Description

Basic concepts and methods of comparative political analysis. Introduction to political institutions, processes, and problems of democratic, non-democratic, and transitional political systems.

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will be able to:

This course offers an introduction to concepts and theories relevant for the study of comparative government. Its central purpose is to analyze the similarities and differences between the principal forms of government in the modern world. It concludes by considering why countries become democratic through a case study of Uruguay. This course also satisfies the critical thinking and inquiry in the social & behavioral sciences requirement of the Minerva’s Academic Curriculum (MAC). It, as a result, will have students practice how (1) to analyze claims, arguments, artifacts or information critically and (2) to construct coherent, evidence-based arguments.

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure Percentage/Points
5 tests 53%
4 post-test assessments 2%
1 newspaper log 20%
Paper outline 5%
Term paper 20%

Grading Scale

Percentage Letter Grade
93-100A
90-92A-
87-89B+
83-86B
80-82B-
77-79C+
73-76C
70-72C-
67-69D+
63-66D
60-62D-
0-59F

Attendance/Participation:

Attendance/participation is not a graded component included in the student's final grade for this course.

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, 2nd ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2019).
  • Kenneth Newton and Jan W. Van Deth, Foundations of Comparative Politics, 4th ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
  • Lawrence Weschler, A Miracle, A Universe: Settling Accounts with Torturers (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
  • The New York Times (​http://www.nytimes.com/educationrate).

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.