Course Description
Students utilize a fictional case study approach to develop human rights investigation and critical reporting skills, and analyze human rights documents.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
- To develop critical familiarity with Human Rights documents and the theoretical and historical foundations of these documents;
- To consider the relationship between human rights work and official human rights discourses.
- To consider critiques of human rights discourse, practices and institutions in terms of claims of universality and the ways in which human rights discourse is mobilized in specific contexts.
- To develop human rights investigation and critical reporting skills.
Course Grading Information:
| Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
| Discussion Board Participation | 20% |
| Human Rights Reports | 20% |
| Essays | 30% |
| Final Report | 30% |
Grading Scale
| Percentage | Letter Grade |
|---|---|
| 93 to 100% | A |
| 90 to < 93% | A- |
| 87 to < 90% | B+ |
| 83 to < 87% | B |
| 80 to < 83% | B- |
| 77 to < 80% | C+ |
| 73 to < 77% | C |
| 70 to < 73% | C- |
| 67 to < 70% | D+ |
| 63 to < 67% | D |
| 60 to < 63% | D- |
| 0 to < 60% | F |
Attendance/Participation:
Regular participation in online discussion is an important, required component of the course. Discussions provide opportunities to:
1. demonstrate your understanding of the reading assignments,
2. expand your understanding of the readings through the process of articulating your ideas and responding to the thoughts and insights of your classmates, and
3. interact with your classmates and professor in a learning community
Each week you will be required to make at least three substantive contributions to the class discussion.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
Linda Polman, The Crisis Caravan
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.