Basic Environmental Design III

Course Description

Studio investigations of spaces as articulated by the interaction of individual and place. Emphasis placed on cognitive understanding of design process, light and color, construction systems, and ongoing study of materials. Prerequisite: IAR 102; Corequisite: IAR 211

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will be able to:

  • Document and analyze organism behavior, habitat, movement, sensory and climatic response, material patterns, and individual/collective relationships through reliable sources, diagrams, and models.
  • Translate biological relationships into a human-scale quasi-human client and spatial criteria while applying anthropometrics, ergonomics, inclusive design, accessibility, and human wellbeing evidence.
  • Apply an iterative design process that uses inquiry, precedent, programming, multiple alternatives, testing, evaluation, and documented reflection to develop progressively complex solutions.
  • Compose two- and three-dimensional spatial sequences through solid/void, positive/negative space, scale, layering, enclosure/exposure, movement, wayfinding, light, and color.
  • Develop material and tectonic systems that communicate structure, properties, performance, fabrication, assembly, adaptation, demountability, maintenance, life safety, and environmental impact.
  • Analyze natural and downtown sites, programs, and real public users; apply foundational accessibility, circulation, egress, safety, legal, drainage, service, and stewardship criteria to responsible proposals.
  • Integrate environmental and wellbeing strategies such as daylight and electric light, color, shade, ventilation, thermal and acoustic awareness, water, energy, planting, waste, material reuse, and life-cycle thinking.
  • Interpret research and communicate design intent, alternatives, technical development, and final decisions through writing, drawings, physical and digital models, visualization, verbal critique, and response to feedback.

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure Percentage/Points
Phase 1 – Living Organism as Architectural Mentor 10%
Phase 2 – Scalar Translation: The Quasi-Human Client 10%
Phase 3 – Embodied Refuge in Nature 20%
Phase 4 – Liminal Urban Interiority 25%
Phase 5 – The Microtopian Commons 25%
Studio Practice – preparedness/attendance (4%), critique and peer engagement (3%), process archive (3%) 10%
Total 100%

Numerical grades are not rounded automatically. Final grades reflect the evidence submitted and the standards described in the assignment rubrics.

Grading Scale

Percentage Letter Grade
93–100A
90–92.99A−
87–89.99B+
83–86.99B
80–82.99B−
77–79.99C+
73–76.99C
70–72.99C−
67–69.99D+
63–66.99D
60–62.99D−
Below 60F

Attendance/Participation:

Preparedness and attendance account for 4% of the final grade within Studio Practice. Attendance is recorded each meeting as present/engaged, partial, or absent. Arriving more than 20 minutes late, leaving early without prior communication, or attending without the work needed for studio may be recorded as partial; two partial records equal one absence for this calculation. After two unexcused absences, each additional unexcused absence reduces the preparedness/attendance component by one percentage point, up to the full 4%. Documented circumstances are addressed through the applicable UNCG process and reasonable arrangements with the instructor.

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

  • Basic studio supplies: sketchbook, tracing paper, pencils/pens, measuring and cutting tools, metal ruler, adhesives, safety glasses, and basic model-making materials.
  • Project-dependent consumables and production materials: printing, presentation boards, model supplies, and optional digital fabrication selected in response to the student's proposal.
  • Closed-toe shoes are required for shop work; students need to purchase suitable footwear only if they do not already own it.

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.