Higher Education in the U.S.

Course Description

Policy governance and legal issues affecting contemporary higher education in the U.S. and their historical background.

Syllabus

Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:

Students successfully completing this course will be able to:

  • Examine key philosophical perspectives as ways of thinking about knowledge, education, and humanity that have shaped contemporary higher education in the United States.
  • Analyze historical factors that have influenced the current landscape of U.S. higher education.
  • Explain the guiding philosophies and values of the student affairs profession.
  • Critically evaluate who U.S. higher education institutions were originally designed by and for, and apply this lens to course readings and discussions.
  • Explore and analyze topics related to campus climate, student representation, access, inclusion, and sense of belonging.
  • Develop and demonstrate skills in analysis, synthesis, and oral and written communication, and apply these skills to the study of higher education history and contemporary issues.

Course Grading Information:

Activity/Performance Measure Percentage/Points
Article Discussion Facilitation 20 points
Model Higher Education Institution Group Presentation/Brochure (20 pts. for section submissions & 30 pts. for finalized group materials) 50 points
Individual Reflections (7 opportunities across the semester) 20 points
Class and Group Meetings - Attendance and Participation 10 points
Total 100 points

Attendance/Participation:

Class and Group Meetings - Attendance and Participation are assessed as 10 points of the total grade.

Course Materials Purchased by the Students:

  • American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual for the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (This will be required in every course, you may want to purchase it).

Scholarly Perspectives

This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.