Course Description
An examination of development from conception through middle childhood across family, context, and culture. Explores variability in individual development and factors related to health and well-being.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of the interaction between biological and environmental factors that influence children’s academic , emotional ,
mental , social, and physical health trajectories .
Demonstrate understanding of cultural variability in families of young children and its implications for children’s academic , emotional , mental ,
social, and physical health outcomes.
Integrate information about child development from the textbook , research articles , lectures, videos, social media and or group discussions.
Apply information from this class to future experiences including parenting , teaching , and professional occupations serving families and children.
Minerva’s Academic Curriculum Health & Wellness Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Demonstrate knowledge of factors that contribute to physical and/ or mental health .
Analyze the connections of different aspects of wellness (i.e. choices or actions to achieve health / well- being to the overall health of an individual
or population ).
Synthesize information from multiple sources to support arguments and/ or informed decisions.
Integrate and cite sources accurately and correctly .
Teachers Academy Conceptual Framework Mission Statement:
The mission of professional education at UNCGis to prepare and support the professional development of caring , collaborative , and competent educators who work in diverse settings. This mission is carried out in an environment that nurtures the active engagement of all participants , values individual as well as cultural diversity , and recognizes the importance of reflection and integration of theory and practice . UNCG'sprofessional education programs are guided by shared commitments to: (a) equity and excellence in teaching , research, and service; (b) professional integrity and ethical deliberation in dealing with students and colleagues (universitybased, school- based, and community - based); (c) the construction of a professional knowledge base through collaboration and collegiality ; and (d) the dissemination of professional knowledge , skills and dispositions through the preparation and continuing professional development of teachers, principals and other school personnel.
Course Grading Information:
Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
Syllabus Quiz | 5 points |
Development Journal: Entry 1A (AIP) | 5 points |
Introduction Discussion (AIP) | 5 points |
Theorist Assignment (AIP) | 15 points |
Development Journal: Entry 1B (AIP) | 5 points |
Exam 1 | 20 points |
Development Journal: Entry 2A (AIP) | 5 points |
Examination of Toy Market Paper (AIP) | 25 points |
Development Journal: Entry 2B (AIP) | 5 points |
Exam 2 | 20 points |
Development Journal: Entry 3A (AIP) | 5 points |
Parenting in Pop Culture (AIP) | 15 points |
Child Advocacy Mini-Campaign (AIP) | 15 points |
Child Observation Paper (AIP) | 25 points |
Development Journal: Entry 3B (AIP) | 5 points |
Exam 3 | 20 points |
Development Journal: Entry 4A (AIP) | 5 points |
Child Care Research (AIP) | 15 points |
Developmental MythBusters (AIP) | 15 points |
Development Journal: Entry 4B (AIP) | 10 points |
Exam 4 | 20 points |
Attendance | 15 points |
Grading Scale
Percentage | Letter Grade |
|---|---|
93-100% | A |
90-92% | A- |
87-89% | B+ |
83-86% | B |
80-82% | B- |
77-79% | C+ |
73-76% | C |
70-72% | C- |
67-69% | D+ |
63-66% | D |
60-62% | D- |
0-59% | F |
Attendance/Participation:
Attendance is recorded and counted as part of student's overall grade for this course.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
Exploring Lifespan Development 4th Edition by Berk. Sage Publisher. ISBN:1071895222
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.