Course Description
Principles of written discourse with a survey of techniques of teaching composition. Instruction in composing, editing, and criticizing written discourse.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
- The ability to read critically and discuss the aesthetic, rhetorical, or cultural qualities in texts.
- The ability to develop convincing, well-supported print or digital projects.
- Students will understand and articulate current theories and philosophies of writing processes and the teaching of writing for k-12 students.
Course Grading Information:
| Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
| Discussion Posts and Participation (includes writing group) | 25% |
| Multigenre Project — 1st draft through final (must include all process work and reflection letters) | 25% |
| Argument Writing Assignment Design | 25% |
| Midterm and Final Reflection Essay (Daybook Defense) | 25% |
Grading Scale
| Percentage | Letter Grade |
|---|---|
| 94%–100% | A |
| 90%–93% | A– |
| 87%–89% | B+ |
| 84%–86% | B |
| 80%–83% | B– |
| 77%–79% | C+ |
| 74%–76% | C |
| 70%–73% | C– |
| 67%–69% | D+ |
| 64%–66% | D |
| 60%–63% | D– |
| below 60% | F |
Attendance/Participation:
Active attendance is required. Learning happens in community, not in a silo — you can't participate if you're not present. You are allowed two absences, excused or unexcused, no questions asked. Starting with the third absence, 5 points are deducted from your final grade per absence (e.g., an 85 becomes an 80 at 3 absences, 75 at 4, 70 at 5). Be proactive if something comes up — contact me before you've missed a week. Simply attending is not enough for full participation credit; you need to engage meaningfully—which means you are reading and bringing your understanding to class discussions.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
Mead Composition Book
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.