Course Description
Examination of market failure, public goods, economic efficiency, and income incidence, allocative effects, and public policy. Prerequisite: ECO 301, ECO 302, and ECO 350 or STA 301.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
Use their knowledge of economics to conduct policy analysis; and
Communicate their findings orally and in writing in a clear, coherent, professional, and informative manner.
Produce a major paper on a public policy of the student’s choice;
Learn how to formulate economic policy questions;
Know how to find and use appropriate data to address economic policy questions;
Know how to find, read, and cite appropriate scholarly works related to a given policy issue;
Understand the difference between correlation and causation; and
Use economic theory to predict the effects of a government policy.
Course Grading Information:
Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
Research Paper | 55% |
First paper summary | 5% |
Literature review | 5% |
Theoretical model | 5% |
Identifying economic data | 5% |
Paper presentation | 7% |
Final draft of paper | 28% |
Other Assignments | 45% |
Discussion assignments (5 total) | 25% |
Paper summary assignment | 5% |
Empirical assignment | 5% |
Job preparation (2 total) | 10% |
Grading Scale
Percentage | Letter Grade |
|---|---|
93% to 100% | A |
90% to 92.9% | A- |
86% to 89.9% | B+ |
83% to 85.9% | B |
80% to 82.9% | B- |
76% to 79.9% | C+ |
73% to 75.9% | C |
70% to 72.9% | C- |
66% to 69.9% | D+ |
63% to 65.9% | D |
60% to 62.9% | D- |
below 60% | F |
Attendance/Participation:
Attendance/participation is not a graded component included in the student's final grade for this course.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
Packback online discussion platform, which is included in the “First Day Complete” program.
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.