Course Description
Contemporary theory and practice of relational communication, with emphasis on increasing awareness of strategic and ethical uses of communication to build relationships.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
MAC Critical Thinking & Inquiry in the Social & Behavioral Sciences
- Critically analyze claims, arguments, artifacts or information.
- Construct coherent, evidence-based arguments.
Communication Studies SLOs (Inclusive of above outcomes)
- Identify, define, and analyze interpersonal communication and its role in a healthy society
- Apply theoretical perspectives and applicable skills to various dimensions of interpersonal relationships
- Analyze lived experience in interpersonal relationships
Course Grading Information:
| Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
| Reflection Assignments | 15% |
| Media Minute Presentation | 20% |
| Exams (3 at 10% each) | 30% |
| Participation and Quizzes | 10% |
| Relationship Analysis Paper | 25% |
Grading Scale:
| Percentage | Letter Grade |
|---|---|
| ≥ 93.0% | A |
| 90.0-92.9% | A- |
| 87.0-89.9% | B+ |
| 83.0-86.9% | B |
| 80.0-82.9% | B- |
| 77.0-79.9% | C+ |
| 73.0-76.9% | C |
| 70.0-72.9% | C- |
| 67-69.9% | D+ |
| 63.0-66.9% | D |
| 60.0-62.9% | D- |
| <60.0% | F |
Attendance/Participation:
This course is participation intensive and therefore requires regular attendance. Three absences are permitted without penalty (as long as they are not on an exam or presentation day). Beginning with the 4th absence, 1 point will be deducted from your final grade in the course.
Additionally, 2 tardies count as an absence. Late work is not accepted unless there has been an emergency.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
Galvin, K.M. & Cooper, P.J. (2011). Making Connections: Readings in Relational Communication (Fifth edition). New York: Oxford.
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.