Course Description
An examination of ethical problems created by technology. Additional emphasis given to the historical, legal, and cultural impacts technology has had on our society.
Syllabus
Student Learning Outcomes, Goals, Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
Critically analyze the historical evolution of technological innovations and their impacts on people, cultures, and societies.
Identify, analyze, and articulate the essential components of Aristotelian virtue theory.
Reflect, critically evaluate, and argue the impacts of technology on the student’s own life experiences and developmental processes—intellectually, socially, emotionally, and ethically.
Critically synthesize and argue the student’s position on the applicability of technomoral virtues to 21st century (and future) technologies.
Course Grading Information:
Activity/Performance Measure | Percentage/Points |
|---|---|
Readings/Viewings/Discussions[One, integrated assignment category—foundation of course] | 30% |
Quizzes | 20% |
Mid-Term Analysis Paper | 25% |
Final Exam: Questions & Short Essay | 25% |
Grading Scale
Percentage | Letter Grade |
|---|---|
94 - 100% | A |
90 - 93% | A- |
87 - 89% | B+ |
83 - 86% | B |
80 - 82% | B- |
77 - 79% | C+ |
73 - 76% | C |
70 – 72% | C- |
67 – 69% | D+ |
63 – 66% | D |
60 – 62% | D- |
Below 60% | F |
Attendance/Participation:
BLS 363-01 is an asynchronous online class. Attendance and participation cannot be physically monitored. Grades are based on student performance.
Course Materials Purchased by the Students:
*NOTE: The following texts are required purchases for those students who prefer reading PRINT material:
- Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting (2016) by Shannon Vallor / ISBN: 9780190905286
- The Machine Stops by E.M. Forster Book (2013) / ISBN-13: 978-1434442048
*Online formats of these titles will also be provided in Canvas modules.
Scholarly Perspectives
This course engages diverse scholarly perspectives to develop critical thinking, analysis, and debate and inclusion of a reading does not imply endorsement.